June 20, 2010

Buyer Beware. . .

Filed under: bad eBay experiences,counterfeit and questionable cards — webjon @ 9:19 pm

The seller I get emailed the most about from eBay is ulrealdealz00, and they are back selling autographs on eBay again. I know at least one card was returned to this seller as counterfeit, and they keep selling the same cards over and over again, and they are either using the same scans for some of their auctions or they are selling the same card over and over again. . .

Use caution when dealing with any seller you aren’t familiar with. . . Ask questions. . . does the image in the auction show the card you are buying, do they guarantee the card is genuine, what is their return policy.

Never buy a card without seeing a scan or photo of the card you are buying, and if the seller won’t guarantee the card is authentic, or if they don’t accept returns — run!

Good luck!

Jon

June 19, 2010

I’d love it if this plan came together. . .

Filed under: General — webjon @ 3:11 pm

I love The A-Team. . . no, not the one with Rampage Jackson, and that guy from The Hangover — The REAL A-Team. . . (Actually the new one may be just fine, I haven’t seen it yet though). . . I don’t know why I love The A-Team, I mean when the DVD for Season 1 was released I ran out on the day it was released and bought it. . .I popped it in the DVD player and watched almost an entire episode before turning it off. I’ve never touched the DVDs again, but still — inexplicably — I love The A-Team, and I think it’s a crime that Mr. T has never signed an official autograph card.

Clearly The A-Team is popular — they got freaking Liam Neeson, Jessica Biel and Bradley Cooper (yeah, The Hangover guy) to show up for the new movie. . . But who cares about The A-Team 2010. . . 1983 is where it’s at — George Peppard, Dirk Benedict, Dwight Schultz, Mr. T, and of course — the most important component Stephen J. Cannell. . . ring any bells?

If you happened to pick up any of 5FINITY’s Greatest American Heroes cards you might have found a card signed by Stephen J. Cannell — he’s the dude that created Greatest American Hero, and a little show called The Freaking A-Team. He’s an important dude, and clearly a good guy since he obviously had some involvement with 5FINITY on The Greatest American Hero set. . .

So here is what I propose — 5FINTITY — please call Stephen J. Cannell immediately and secure the rights to create an A-Team trading card set. . . go ahead — call now. . . I’ll wait here.

I’m sure there are some agreements to sign and things that will take time, so while we are waiting out the paperwork here is what I propose for a 5FINITY set . . . it’s slightly different than their normal offering, but that’s cool.

First — the key to this set is autographs. . . but not sketch autographs, on card autos like Dean Yeagle’s from Mandy. It would be cool if you could get some photos from the 80s for the autos, but if you can’t have an artist that draws awesome likenesses whip some up. I figure Benedict and Schultz have signed autos for other sets, so I would imagine they’d be game to do it again. Mr. T has done 1-800-Collect commercials so I can’t imagine he’d turn it down either. Peppard, sadly has passed away, but his autographs are fairly plentiful and relatively cheap so some cut signatures (a decent number so I actually have a chance to pull one or buy one) would be good. Of course some Cannell autos. . . if you need additional autos you could do some combo autos, look to some of the show’s guest stars, or even find Melinda Culea, who played Amy A Allen. Of course there will be plenty of sketches, but the autos should be readily available. . . I’d love to see 1 auto and 1 sketch per pack, or 1 auto OR 1 sketch per pack. . . Or, if you released a set of the autographs with a Peppard cut that would be cool too. . .

I pity the fool that doesn’t want an A-Team set!

Jon

June 14, 2010

An artist returns. . .

Filed under: news — webjon @ 5:50 pm

Nar is back, which is awesome news. . . and he has a very interesting story about why he left our little hobby for some time. . . Everyone should read it: http://www.scoundrelpublishing.com/spart/viewtopic.php?t=19916

Now that you’re back from reading Nar’s post take a second to realize how small this industry is. When you meet a company representative at a card show, or talk to one over email it’s probably ‘THE GUY.’ You know — the guy in charge of X. Now that isn’t always the case, especially with Topps and Upper Deck, but for almost every other manufacturer when you talk to some one — it’s the person in charge, or at least the person with a ton of power in the company. . .

Think about that. . . if you have a problem with your car, or your cell phone, computer, shoes, milk, whatever — can you talk to anyone important involved in the production or distribution of that product? No, most likely you are talking to some underpaid counter jockey who just wants their work day to end. . .

This is a small industry.

I’d post a picture of some of Nar’s work here. . . but I can’t afford any :-)

Welcome Back Nar! Everyone should take note, and no one should treat anyone else poorly in this industry. . . there is one dealer who screwed me over about 15 years ago. . . I haven’t purchased anything from her since, I’ve avoided her eBay auctions, I’ve skipped her table at countless shows — all over some $15 card she probably doesn’t remember. . . that little ‘insignificant’ screw job she pulled on me has cost her hundreds if not thousands in sales in the last 15 years. . . Treat the folks you deal with in this industry well. . . or it’ll cost you in the long run one way or another.

Now, Nar — what are you waiting for? Get cranking out more beautiful cards I can’t afford!

Jon

June 8, 2010

Dear Topps: Is that ON the card?

Filed under: Topps — webjon @ 8:25 pm

Back when Indiana Jones sketches were hitting the streets I was looking at nice sketch — it was a portrait of Indy, but it was looking a little Mikhail Gorbachev to me. . . I showed the card to an artist and asked in dismay “Is that ON the card?” I was referring to that strange red map thing in the background of some of the Indiana Jones set, and sure enough it was on the card. I couldn’t believe that a manufacturer would put a background on an original art card that would complete with the art. . .

I sort of just lived with it. . . chalked it up to a bad design decision, but then the strange backgrounds kept coming. . . that grid thing (Star Wars), the blotchy thing (Heroes), a Death Star thing, and others, I’m sure. . . and now the colander thing on the new Star Wars Empire Strikes Back 3D set. I couldn’t believe how bad that background was when I saw it on ruining some great work by Cynthia Cummens — even the color cards have that never ending colander effect.

The question is why? Why put backgrounds on the cards that artists don’t like drawing on, and collectors don’t like collecting? Why put a competing design on the card? I kept asking myself why? Why would they do that. . . then it dawned on me — Topps must not know it’s a problem! So I decided to publicly send them a letter:

June 8, 2010

Dear Topps,

Thank you for producing some excellent card sets! I particularly enjoy the licenses you’ve picked up over the last several years, and I am very excited to see what you do with Avatar!

While I’m writing I wanted to let you know that the background designs you have been using for many recent sketch card releases detract from the art on the card! Collectors and artists would prefer a simple, solid background in a very very light, neutral color. Luckily this change will result in less work for your art/design department!

If you have any questions or concerns on the matter please feel free to post on any public trading card forum!

Thank you!

Jon
(On Behalf of artists and collectors everywhere)

Hopefully that was a constructive and concise way to describe the issue. . . now we wait for the next sketch set!

Happy Collecting,

Jon

June 4, 2010

The Real Indiana Jones?

Filed under: Topps,counterfeit and questionable cards — webjon @ 4:41 pm

I just saw these on eBay, up for sale with ambiguous descriptions by seller cindymullins2. The entire description reads (varies slightly by card): “This auction is for one sketch card from the 2008 Topps Indiana Jones And The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull.”

While the card stock featured in the auction may have been inserted in a pack at one time, the art nearly certainly was not. Looks like a redraw over another artists work. If you like this style card I’d suggest getting your favorite artist to do one for you rather than supporting folks who go this route.

Jon

June 3, 2010

Unsolicited Advice: P’ups.

Filed under: 5FINITY,opinion — webjon @ 10:11 pm

I’ve been watching some of the auctions for P’ups cards for the artists that interest me, and I have to say the selling prices on a lot of these have been really sad. In fact this has been a bit of a trend in some other recent sets as well — Voltron comes to mind. So what’s the issue?

While there are certainly many contributing factors, the fact that great cards done by great artists with pin-ups on them aren’t even able to fetch $20 minimum bids in many cases probably has some people scratching their heads (perhaps the manufacturer) — others grumbling in frustration (dealers) — and others either shrugging it off or very happy for the bargains they are getting (collectors). . .

The biggest contributing factor, in my opinion is that these aren’t reaching a large enough collector base to sustain any interest. Alright, that certainly isn’t a revelation — the question is why, and I think that’s easy enough to answer.

WAYYYY back in March P’ups sold out in 10 hours. That’s right, if you happened to sleep in the night these were announced available for sale you were shut out of pre-orders. So, right out the gate many people who might be interested in a pack here or there were turned away instantly, unless they wanted to pay a premium for packs or singles. But really, it isn’t how fast P’ups sold out that’s the issue, it’s who bought the packs. A decent percentage likely went to people who were interested in collecting the cards, but a TON went to dealers who wanted to ‘rip and flip’ the packs.

Who knows how many, but at one point shortly after release there were 650 P’ups sketches for sale on eBay. Even today weeks after release there are nearly 400 of these cards on eBay. Let’s put that into perspective — 1500 packs were made. Of course some packs had an additional sketch, and also of course some of the 400 on eBay now have been auctioned before. . . but at one point well over a third of the entire production run was on eBay at the same time.

And really, that’s not an issue in and of itself, the real problem at that point was the INSANE Buy-It-Now prices many dealers had on most of their cards. Collectors realize dealers need to make a profit, but they aren’t stupid. Lots of decent, but ‘common’ sketches from P’ups were being listed at 4 times the pack price or better — a 300% profit — the rare, and many nice cards were being listed at 6-10x the pack price!

So what happened? The few collectors that were able to get pre-orders in stuck around and collected a few additional sketches — and NO new collectors bought into the set. The end result is what we have today, lots of cards not being able to find buyers, and the ones that do sell are bringing typically less than double the pack price. If more dealers would have started all their P’ups auctions at $21 (a mere 50% profit per card) we’d likely have many more collectors, and organically higher prices for the better cards.

The situation now is tenuous, many dealers are frustrated, many collectors who couldn’t buy P’ups at pre-order price or a reasonable price afterwords are frustrated and have walked away and the few collectors left are picking over the carcass.

The lesson, in my mind, is that more attention needs to be paid to the people who are actually sinking their money into this product at the end of the day. Not the rip and flipper whose only interest in the set is the amount of profit they can make, but the people who are going to spend their hard earned money to add these cards to their collections. Now, don’t get me wrong . . . not every person who bought and sold P’ups sketches falls into this category, but if you look at the history of how these cards were listed the story is pretty clear.

What to do now?

Extend the pre-order period. Get more cards into the hands of the people who actually want to keep them. I’m not sure how to do that, perhaps limit the number of cards per order even more (selling out in 10 hours is good for the short term, but it doesn’t do anything to build buzz or interest in a set, in fact it frustrates a lot of people), perhaps drop the 25 card incentives so there is less incentive to buy more cards than people personally want, I’m not sure how to do it, but there has to be a way.

Dealers also need to be willing to sell the cards they are ripping and flipping at organic levels, not artificially inflated prices — not every card pulled from a $14 pack should sell for $40, or even $30. What’s wrong with a $5-6 profit on a $14 pack — that’s not to say the great cards won’t sell for $75, but many dealers seemed to think that starting an auction at $19.95 for something they paid $14-15 is highway robbery. Now that the collectors have avoided this set many dealers are hoping to get that $20 sale.

It’s good for me, I’ve picked up some AMAZING cards cheap (thanks Rachel, Craig, Nick and a few others), but it’s bad for the hobby and the industry.

Jon

May 31, 2010

Cheap Chris Pine Too Good to Be True?

Webjon reader, and counterfeit Chris Pine buyer Delia alerted me to the card you see in the scan. Offered at the unbelievably low Buy-It-Now price of $100. I emailed the seller and asked if they guaranteed the card was genuine. They never responded, but unsurprisingly the card was sold via Buy-It-Now very quickly.

Now Delia points out another one has popped up for sale by the same seller. . . using the same scan even!

Let’s see. . . price too good to be true, crappy scan, overseas seller, feedback rating: 2 (no feedback for selling), doesn’t respond to questions about authenticity . . . Hmm. . . that’s at least 5 red flags for a single auction. . . I’d avoid this seller’s auctions like the plague. . . These cards are questionable at best, and very likely counterfeit. If anyone knows the buyer of the first card please let them know!

Thanks, Delia for looking out for collectors out there!

Jon

May 30, 2010

Death and Cards.

Filed under: General,news — webjon @ 10:16 am

For some reason death seems to have become all to common in the trading card world. Recently the world has lost stars Gary Coleman, Corey Haim, Peter Graves, Robert Culp, among others and even artist Pat Carlucci passed away recently.

I still remember when Steve Irwin passed away. Ironically I had been thinking about ordering a bunch of boxes of Crocodile Hunter at about $10 a box in the hopes of pulling the Croc Hunters autograph. I had ten boxes added to my online shopping cart at marchantcards.com. . . but I wasn’t sure I wanted to spend the money. I went to bed, leaving the shopping card open on my computer and woke up to hear the news that he had died. Of course I was shocked, and of course the boxes of Croc Hunter were sold out immediately — I didn’t manage to get a single box. I was bewildered to see the price of his autograph jump from around $100 to over $300 overnight — it was insane, and the profiteers made me feel sick to my stomach. That was in 2006, when the death of a celebrity who contributed to trading cards pretty uncommon. Now it seems like every other month a celeb, wrestler or artist who put pen to trading card is passing away.

The profiteers make me feel less sick to my stomach now. . . perhaps I’m getting numb to it. . . When Corey Haim died his autographs jumped from about $15 to over $100. Coleman’s have also spiked since his unfortunate untimely passing. . . After watching Haim’s cards spike at around $115 then immediately fall to half that I started thinking maybe I should have dumped my two Haims and bought ‘em back. . . Perhaps I should do the same with Coleman. I should have done that with Bernie Mac, his cards followed a very similar trajectory to Haim’s.

I still really don’t understand the sudden jump in value in these cards. Of course I understand supply and demand. . . so I guess what I don’t understand is the sudden need for people to run out and by the autograph of someone who recently died. That creeps me out a bit.

Years ago an autograph dealer and I had a conversation about autographs. . . the quote that sticks with me today is when Bill said “Cold is Gold.” Morbid, but apparently true. . . so where does that leave me? I collected these autographs out of my enjoyment of the actors and their characters. . . Perhaps I should pass my enjoyment of these cards on to other collectors who are mourning the loss as well, then six months down the road I can buy them back for a percentage of what I sold them for. . . I dunno.

Leave a comment if you have any opinions on the matter. . .

Jon

May 25, 2010

5FINITY P’ups review.

Filed under: General — webjon @ 11:18 pm

Pups reviewP’ups. . . Pin-ups and Puppies. . . the concept certainly isn’t obvious, if you look at the heritage of P’ups you’ll see that it was born from success of 5FINITY’s Mandy set. Mandy is a pin-up gal who frequents the pages of men’s magazines with her dog Skoots. By current standards Mandy was a slow starter — it took a week for 5FINITY to sell out of the product, but after that week the prices for cards and packs exploded. While 5FINITY’s previous releases were all successful Mandy was a phenomenon, and likely the turning point for 5FINITY as releases since Mandy tend to sell out in hours rather than days lead by massive collector orders as well as dealer speculation.

As a follow up of sorts to Mandy 5FINITY created P’ups featuring scantily clad babes and their puppies, and this set is loaded from all angles. The artist line up is excellent, the chase packs feature everything from rare artist cards to commission cards to sketches of Mandy by her creator Dean Yeagle, and on top of that 5FINITY created a contest — collect all 50 dog breeds and get a master set of sketches. I figured this would be in the same vein as a McDonalds Monopoly contest where there would be 1 super rare dog breed and thus 1 master set given away, but no — 5FINITY turned things up another notch making it actually possible to put sets together — 14 are mathematically possible from what I hear, although they don’t think they’ll get that many. The company was also astute enough to realize they shouldn’t just crank out an extra few hundred P’ups sketches as that would potentially screw all the people who were collecting the set so the master set sketches will be on a different card stock — everyone wins!

Let me repeat that in case you missed it. 5FINITY actually pays attention to the industry/collectors and cares about what happens after they produce a set — they care about their customers.

I loved Mandy. It was my top pick of 2009. There were a few reasons I loved Mandy, first the art was exceptional, second it was a good value, finally — and most importantly I knew what I was getting in almost every pack — Mandy. Now, I never followed Mandy before the cards came out, in fact I still don’t follow Mandy at all, but I really liked that I knew what the character should look like and I was able to see various artists interpretations of the character and what she might be doing. I ordered a lot (by my standards) of P’ups based on my enjoyment of Mandy — plus 10% of the sketches in P’ups were of Mandy and Skoots, so it was a win-win, right?

The packs arrived, and I was a little anxious after shelling out a bunch of money for packs of a product based on Pin-Ups and Puppies . . . the concept still hadn’t gelled with me. I popped open the envelope and pulled out my incentive card — it was a really nice Benjamin Glendenning sketch of some random hot chick and 2 puppies. I was off to a great start, and late to lunch with my co-workers so I stashed the packs until after lunch wondering what surprised awaited. . . so far P’ups was good to me.

Pups reviewOnce I returned I thumbed through all the packs picking out my lucky number, I slid my finger up the side of the pack and pulled out the sketch. . . I looked down to see a card that gave me that sick feeling in my stomach. . . there was nothing pin-up about the card, and the quality was far below what I’ve come to enjoy from 5FINITY. I swallowed hard and stuffed everything back in the envelopes to open more later.

When later came I opened pack after pack and I wasn’t disappointed in another card out of all 25 packs I opened. Even though I started with a dud the overall quality of the art in the set is excellent. I pulled a couple of chase packs, a couple of Mandy cards and overall was . . . satisfied.

P’ups isn’t Mandy, and I didn’t expect it to be, but after looking through all the cards the concept of Pin-ups and Puppies just doesn’t work for me. I don’t care about the puppies, and the pin-ups are just random babes so that cohesive element (Mandy) that kept me interested in *all* of the Mandy cards doesn’t exist here. I will collect some artists because they did excellent work, and I’ll collect others who have done cool themes with their cards like Leak’s caricatures and Dekraker’s space girls, and of course I’ll attempt to pick up Mandy cards here and there, but this set didn’t leave me craving more like Mandy did.

Don’t get me wrong P’ups is a great set — I mean . . . what do you judge a set on?
Quality — this set has excellent quality.
Value (at release date) — amazing, $14 for a great sketch — you can’t go wrong.
Content — It definitely delivers what it promises.

Those attributes certainly make it one of the top releases so far this year.

What would I change? More themes or less dogs. . . several artists had great themes — like Dekraker and Leak as mentioned, or like Frankie B Washington — his cards have a retro vibe and are very cool. Or give me an identifiable pin-up girl that I can collect across the individual artists.

I’d also get more cards in the hands of collectors. I’ve heard complaints from a few collectors about the prices dealers are slapping on some of these cards. Thankfully it seems that collectors have refused to pay outrageous prices for these as the prices have already dropped back to a reasonable level after an initial spike.

What would I keep the same. . . the quality of the art . . . no real room for improvement here. The price point, the small release size.

Overall: A

Thank you to 5FINITY for another great set, and thank you to all the small press manufacturers out there who are shaking it up in the industry and truly creating interesting products.

Webjon Card Reviews.

Filed under: reviews — webjon @ 9:56 pm

I’ve wanted to start writing product reviews for quite a while on Webjon. I couldn’t for a long time due to my writing for Non-Sport Update — it could have created a lot of friction for NSU if I, a writer for their magazine, were to trash the product of a company that spends lots of advertising dollars with the magazine.

It simply wasn’t in me to write unfaithful reviews, and some products deserve to be trashed — you know — that box you paid a bit too much for hoping to find a good sketch, only to pull a hunk of garbage that leaves you feeling sick to your stomach.

So, now that I have the freedom to be honest I’ll be reviewing many of the products I buy. Unfortunately I don’t buy a ton of boxes any more so there won’t be as many reviews as I’d like, but what can you do.

If you can handle the truth, and an honest review of your product contact me at my email address, or leave a comment on a thread and I’ll contact you.

Onward!

Jon

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »