January 30, 2010

Maggie Grace Counterfeit? I’d vote yes.

Filed under: counterfeit and questionable cards,Inkworks — webjon @ 11:48 pm

After determining the James Franco sold by eBay seller sharpmarbles was likely counterfeit I was contacted by the buyer of sharpmarbles’ Alicia Silverstone autograph who was concerned about it’s legitimacy after reading about the Franco. The Silverstone is a tough card to find, and there aren’t many good scans out there that are easily accessible. Looking at the card I was a little concerned that the signature didn’t look quite right. . . but I didn’t really have much to compare it to.

Since I couldn’t directly help that buyer with the Silverstone I decided to take a look at sharpmarbles other items, and something about their Maggie Grace didn’t sit well with me. After staring at the card for a while I realized that it was simply the last little line in the zig-zag under her signature wasn’t smooth. Obviously that’s not something that’s impossible, for sure, but I too sometimes add a line under my name when I sign, and it’s always the smoothest line in my signature because it doesn’t mean anything — it’s just a little ‘zip’ on the paper and it’s done. . . it might be too long, or short, or in the wrong place, but it’s always smooth since it’s done so quickly.

I forwarded it to Steve, who I nearly always collaborate on this stuff, and he didn’t seem too concerned about my zig-zag, but he didn’t like the placement of the Inkworks seal on the card. He said it was too far to the left, and was a bit on top of the ‘LOST’ logo. I wasn’t too concerned about his logo, and he wasn’t too concerned about my zig-zag. . . but we were both concerned. . . so I decided to look closer.

Thankfully, in this case, there are a bunch of Maggie Grace cards on eBay in current and recent sales. Obviously you can’t compare zig-zags reliably, but Steve was dead on — this was the only Grace Auto out of about a dozen I looked at where the ‘Inkworks Authentic’ logo touched into the LOST logo in the background of the card.

I grabbed a bunch of the better scans of the Grace autographs and started to examine them pretty closely. The first thing I noticed was that Maggie’s hair at the top of the sharpmarbles card didn’t have the dark highlight that it has on all the other cards I saw. If you look above her left eye all the way at the top of the card you’ll see what I mean — there is a wave of hair that swoops from right to left and around the side of the card — above the peak of the wave, at the top of the card, there is a dark highlight on all the non-sharpmarbles cards. Finally I noticed that all of the other cards have a little swatch of hair that shows up directly above the ‘SH’ in Shannon, that doesn’t appear in the sharpmarbles card either. At that point I was convinced there was something going on . . . Is it counterfeit? Well Inkworks is out of business so I highly doubt they will ever confirm this is a counterfeit, and no one I know has seen this card in person so everything I’m going on right now is based on scans. . . but based on what I’ve seen I wouldn’t buy it.

Here are scans of the Sharpmarbles card (first) and one from Razor (plucked from eBay):

If you have a pack pulled Maggie I’d love to hear your comments.

Ohh — and just for the record Sharpmarbles never responded to my email about the Franco.

Jon

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



© 1997-2013 webjon.com.
You are welcome to quote small passages from webjon non-commercially, but please give credit and link to the original material.
Please do not use images without permission. Names, characters, images, etc may be trademarks of various rights holders.
Please respect their trademarks.
Thank you.