December 22, 2011

Happy Holidays from Webjon. . . 5FINITY and Danielle Soloud

Filed under: 5FINITY,General — webjon @ 3:17 pm

2011 has been an interesting year. . . I, for one, couldn’t be happier to usher it out with hopes of 2012 being bigger, better and hopefully far brighter.

5FINITY certainly has been a highlight of 2011 for me personally. I really like what they produce, and their little touches like the March of Dimes release and holiday cards really set their company a part from the competition. . . I love that the card is sketch, which is awesome, but the back is spectacular too.

Wishing you a Happy, Healthy and Lucky 2012. . .

Jon

December 21, 2011

Emilie De Ravin Counterfeit Revisited. . . and Confirmed.

Filed under: counterfeit and questionable cards,Inkworks — webjon @ 12:04 am

Non-sports card forum reader and webjon contributor Steve pointed out a recent acquisition posted by a fellow forum member. His Claire autograph didn’t look right to Steve, and it didn’t look right to me. In fact the card posted looks a lot like the one sold by eBay seller savecoupon that I posted about a bit over a year ago.

Sometimes it is difficult to post about questionable cards, for some reason there are a number of collectors who simply don’t want to believe that there are fake cards out there, so sometimes I hesitate to post cards unless I have solid proof that something is going on. . . I didn’t have any proof when I posted the savecoupon cards and I got flack about it, but sometimes all you have when you see a card is a hunch that it doesn’t look right.

Here is the Inkworks Lost Season 2Emilie De Ravin card posted:

What do you think? The first thing that popped out to me was that the signature was too uniform. There is no variation, feathering or anything. . . beyond that it was just a hunch a year ago, and it was just a hunch today. . . until I took a close look at Steve’s known good Emilie autoraph:

The first thing you’ll notice here is that the signature looks legitimate, there is depth, feathering, etc. Next check out the ‘Inkworks Authentic’ foil stamp. The stamp on the top card is a bit crude in comparison, but it seems to be in the right place (as opposed to other counterfeit cards we’ve seen), so at this point it is still a hunch.

Then I noticed that the fake card showed a whole lot less of the actresses arm, and a lot more of the leaf above her head — of course that could be due to an improperly cut card, but the irrefutable ‘a ha’ moment for this card is the way that the text for her name aligns with the background. It’s most noticeable in the word ‘RAVIN’ on the fake card the word ‘RAVIN’ is covering the dark areas in the background. In authentic card there is distance between where the background ends and the words begin. Check it out:

Obviously something isn’t quite right here, and you can’t blame this on a cutting or printing error.

The frightening thing is that in my opinion these counterfeits have to be an inside job. The only way that a counterfeiter could create fakes that have stuff aligned wrong and printing changes like in this card and the Maggie Grace card that have shown up are if they had access to the production of these cards in a way that collectors don’t. Let me put it another way. . . if a scammer who didn’t have inside access was going to copy these cards they would simply copy the cards, they wouldn’t change them, and they wouldn’t have the ability to change them. Now I’m certainly not implying that Inkworks had a hand in any of this, it could have been any number of people that were involved at some point in the production of these cards, perhaps someone who was able to get the pre-production printing templates.

I hope the buyer gets their money back. . .

Jon

December 19, 2011

Random Thoughts for the End of the Year.

Filed under: General — webjon @ 1:40 am

First off, Happy Holidays! December has been a slow month for posts on Webjon, and for that I apologize. If anyone is interested in stretching out their writing fingers and has something to say drop me a line. . . I’d love to get another writer or two on board.

This holiday season has been busier than most for me, but I’ve found time to grab some blaster boxes of Topps new release American Pie. . . What a fun release. . . The base cards are really interesting, the chase cards are fun, the retail blasters and packs have nice hits (although the packs are crazy easy to cherry pick to buyer beware on loose packs). This is a cool set, and is great for set builders, probably not awesome for rip and flippers, but there are quite a few cards I’ll be chasing in this release. I think Topps found a winning formula, and I can see them expanding this into an ‘American Pie Decades’ release where they do an American Pie release a year covering a decade, much like the MTv ‘I Love the 80s’ type shows. So nice job Topps. . . although I still want to know why there isn’t a Mr. T or Mary Lou Retton autograph out there. . .

Ohh, and if they do another set they can embed arcade tokens into the cards much like they are doing with coins for this release. . . how great would that be? A set based on the 80s with a Mr. T autograph and arcade tokens in the cards. . . Also, they could get animation cels — you know the ones that have a little tiny figure on the huge cel. . . while I’m not for destroying stuff to make cards these have little value as it is, and some of the images are small enough to easily be embedded into a card without cutting in to the art. . .

Speaking of cutting in to the good stuff. . . did you see the recent post on Panini’s blog. . . it’s for some upcoming Donruss cut signature set. They’ve got tons of great signatures in the set, but a bunch of ‘em are cut off like this:

I know, I know this is an old story, but seriously. . . they’ve been doing cut signature sets for far too long to not be able to fit a signature properly. . . this is really sad.

Cryptozoic’s new set The Walking Dead seems to be a hit in most respects. . . Seems like they may have to tweak their collation, but other than that people seem to dig the set, which is awesome. I hope they have great success in the Non-Sport Card world. . . I recently watched a box of their CBLDF release sell for under $30, which hopefully is just an indication of a learning curve and nothing more. . . From what I’ve seen the set looks well done.

A Non-Sport Card Forum poster has a goal to post 100 box break downs in the following year, he’s posted a bunch so far, and the reviews are really interesting. If you haven’t seem ‘em you should check it out. It is a bit sobering to see how frequently the contents aren’t worth the box price.

Speaking of box price. . . with the exception of mass merchants I no longer can buy cards locally. . . I was buying from a comic shop that is about 45 minutes from my house, but I ‘fired’ them when their pack price hit $3, between that price and the price of gas I just couldn’t justify it anymore. . . I have to say, it sucked for a while, but I no longer even miss being able to run out and buy cards. That got me thinking. . . between the dwindling number of comic shops and other non-sport outlets and the advent of premium packs, as well as Rittenhouse offering their new super premium set at a price that seems directed at consumers rather than dealers. . . are dealers being squeezed out of the hobby? And if they are is that a bad thing? I dunno. . .

Anyway. . . hope you all have a great holiday, and finish up the year with great presents and great pulls!

Jon

December 4, 2011

Questionable Affleck Autos on eBay. . .

Thank you to the webjon reader that pointed out eBay auctions # 300629905002 and
# 220906612592. They felt that these two Ben Affleck Daredevil autographs from Topps looked a little too similar:

I took the scans and compared the signatures, and sure enough the autographs are an exact match to each other — line by line, stroke by stroke.

Of course it is possible that Affleck just has a really steady hand, but more than likely something is up here. . . I decided to dig a little further when I realized that the following scan was posted on Webjon back in 2009:

The first thing you will notice about this scan is that it, too, is an exact match of the signatures above. Perhaps it is the same card being sold again, but the important thing about this card is that it was sold by known counterfeit card seller loveandnewyork.

I’d steer clear of these cards, even the card graded by Beckett, this certainly isn’t the first questionable card they’ve slabbed. Beckett reps on Card Talk said that they would take care of anyone who bought a BGS card that turned out to be fake, so there may be some help for this seller. . .

Jon



© 1997-2013 webjon.com.
You are welcome to quote small passages from webjon non-commercially, but please give credit and link to the original material.
Please do not use images without permission. Names, characters, images, etc may be trademarks of various rights holders.
Please respect their trademarks.
Thank you.