January 28, 2011

Josh Holloway Lost A2 — Fake.

Filed under: counterfeit and questionable cards,Inkworks — webjon @ 10:51 pm

A card talker posted wound up with this fake Josh Holloway autograph. As you can see in the scan each line ends in dots, and — as seen with the fake Maggie Grace Lost autograph the Inkworks Authentic logo is touching the ‘Lost’ logo in the background. The Inkworks Authentic logo itself isn’t quite right, too thick and not smooth.

Sorry for the huge scan, it’s really hard to see the defects in a scan that’s even just slightly smaller.

Thank you to Wayne for posting this up and alerting the community!

Jon

January 27, 2011

More Bonaduce Shenanigans

Filed under: counterfeit and questionable cards,Topps — webjon @ 7:38 pm

Two more Danna Bonaduce American Pie buyback autographs have hit eBay. . . The first is numbered to 500, and has a messier signature:

The second has the regular Topps hologram — not numbered to 500, and has a neater signature:


My gut tells me card #2 isn’t quite right here. . . the signature doesn’t match the TNA autos very well and it isn’t numbered to 500. . . As always buyer beware on these buyback autos!

Jon

January 23, 2011

Emma Watson Returns to Webjon.com! (Updated 1-25)

Filed under: Artbox,counterfeit and questionable cards,General — webjon @ 8:28 pm

A webjon reader just tipped me off that the fake Emma Watson autograph that was sold 6 weeks ago by gojets02 (160512423910) for $360 is back on eBay. This time it’s up for sale by platinum_collectables (140504185203). I’ve contacted the seller.

Jon

Update:

I notified the seller this card was counterfeit, and they immediately pulled the auction. According to the seller they attempted to get their money back from gojets2, but were unable to — so they relisted the card: 140505110168. Sadly someone has already bid on this counterfeit.

January 22, 2011

Another Farley. . .

Filed under: counterfeit and questionable cards,Star Pics — webjon @ 10:45 am

I used to love Star Pics autographs. They were my thing. . . they are tough to find so I enjoyed the hunt, and there are some spectacular signatures in the SNL set — among the best is Chris Farley.

I got lucky when I bought my Chris Farley. Mark Macaluso had one I had been eyeballing for several months back in 1997 — the year Farley passed. When I heard the news that one of my favorite comedians was no longer with us one of the first things I did was call Mark and buy that card. I haven’t seen another legitimate one since.

Times were different in 1997, of course. Counterfeits were barely ever spoken of — if anything there were reprint sets of classic cards, but if there were counterfeit autographs I never heard it. Anytime I see a Farley I compare with mine. . . of course it’s possible that my card is questionable, but given that it came from Mark Macaluso in 1997 I’m confident it’s the real deal.

That brings us to the card pictured here — eBay item 260724097721. This card popped up on my radar after two Webjon readers inquired about my opinion of its authenticity.

Unfortunately today isn’t 1997, and while I still love Star Pics autographs my days of hunting ‘em have passed because they are among the easiest and cheapest cards to fake. The autograph cards are on commons, which are readily available and are authenticated with stickers which are also readily available and inexpensive on sports cards.

If you are going to buy a Star Pics autograph you probably should become an expert in Star Pics autographs, and you should probably ask a lot of questions before buying ‘em. Provenance is important with these cards.

I have no idea what the provenance of this card is, so I can only go on what I see. . . I’ve been reluctant to post about this card in many ways because it’s not obviously real or fake, but people have been asking my opinion — and if two people are asking several others are likely wondering.

The first thing that I don’t like about the Farley is there is wear on the edge of the sticker at about 10:00. That wear could be from where someone peeled this sticker from another card. I wouldn’t buy a Star Pics autograph unless the sticker on it is perfect. Additionally the sticker is upside down. When looking at the signature this one doesn’t look very similar to the Farley autograph on my card, but even more than that the loop in the ‘h’ in Chris is shaky, and “Chris” seems thicker than “Farley,” which could be an illusion due to the way the photo was taken, but I don’t think so. I personally wouldn’t buy this card.

Jon

BTW — I hope you all know who Mark Macaluso was — at one point he was probably the biggest non-sport card dealer in the world, he also started the Fantasy Trading Card Company and manufactured several sets. Mark’s untimely death came many years ago leaving a void in the hobby that has yet to be filled.

January 5, 2011

Topps Responds to Superman Returns Counterfeit Inquiry. . .

Filed under: counterfeit and questionable cards,Topps — webjon @ 5:28 pm

Miss Lizzy’s Collectibles just left a comment on a previous post. I think it is very important to highlight this. . .

Miss Lizzy emailed Topps twice about the likely counterfeit Kevin Spacey, Brendan Routh and other highly questionable Superman Returns cards purchased by a collector. . .

Their response is a classic — as posted by Miss Lizzy:

Well, I got a response from Topps (2 weeks later). And guess what they had to say?
“I would send them in to BGS or PSA/DNA for further certification.”
That’s it. That was the whole reply.

Given the number of counterfeit cards we’ve seen slabbed by BGS I’m not sure I’d follow that advice.

This is the most disinterested response I’ve ever heard of a collector/dealer getting from a manufacturer when inquiring about a potential counterfeit. Apparently, Topps isn’t even interested in seeing the cards in person to determine if there are fakes out there.

Thank you for following up, Miss Lizzy!

Jon

Older Posts »


© 1997-2013 webjon.com.
You are welcome to quote small passages from webjon non-commercially, but please give credit and link to the original material.
Please do not use images without permission. Names, characters, images, etc may be trademarks of various rights holders.
Please respect their trademarks.
Thank you.