October 8, 2011

An experiment in cleaning printing plates. . .

Filed under: Breygent,news — webjon @ 11:06 pm

I’ve never been much of a printing plate collector, but found myself with a small stack of ‘em while feverishly cracking Breygent Mystery packs. A couple of my plates looked like they had chicken pox or something, as seen in the Marilyn below. Looking all jaundiced and diseased like that no one would want my Marilyn plate, despite it’s rarity. I asked on Non-Sports Card Forum (www.nonsportcardforum.com) if anyone had tried cleaning printing plates before, and after a short time Nicnac spoke with an expert who confirmed they could be cleaned up with alcohol. I started with Marilyn, since basically the spots destroyed any collectible value, I took a good paper towel and some isopropyl alcohol and went to work on Marilyn. After a minute or two I pulled up the paper towel and looked at the transformation:

I was in awe, not only were the spots gone, but the sickly yellow color was coming off too, I cleaned her a bit more to get more yellow off and was thrilled with the final results. So thrilled in fact, that I took alcohol to some other plates in my collection.

Perhaps I was a bit hasty in my cleaning fervor as I quickly found that not all of the plates improved as much as the first Marilyn. Black ink is far more difficult to remove than the yellow ink was. I actually started using what I assume are stronger and stronger solvents trying to clean the plates off, and while the plates are clearly cleaner than they were before you could argue that their appearance may not have been improved with the cleaning.

My advice is simple, if a plate looks really bad — like the first Marilyn clean it up, if it looks good leave it alone. . . Also, the solvents and alcohol described here will eat the finish off of furniture, so if you do clean up some plates make sure you are working on a surface you don’t care about.

I may clean one more plate. . . a yellow Lindsay Lohan plate from Pop Century. . . If you aren’t familiar the plates in Pop Century are signed via sticker autographs, so this presents some issues. First, the solvent would destroy the autograph, 2nd the entire plate won’t be able to be cleaned since I can’t clean under the sticker. I’m not sure what I’m going to do — it’s an expensive experiment.

Happy Collecting!

Jon

February 6, 2011

Can’t stop looking at this one. . .

Filed under: Breygent,General — webjon @ 12:27 am

I’m not a collector who is in to bragging about their cards, but I have a card that’s been on my desk for a couple of weeks now and I just can’t stop staring at it. The artist is Kevin Leen, the set is Golden Age of Comics (Breygent), and the result is amazing. . .

The card looks so good people have mistaken it for a printed card rather than the sketch card it is. Ohh — and it cost less than $15. There are some very nice cards in this release at great prices.

Jon

January 12, 2010

How Soon We Forget. . .

Filed under: Breygent,counterfeit and questionable cards,General,news — webjon @ 10:41 pm

I just saw some of the chase cards from Breygent’s Paranormal Activity set posted on card talk. For the most part the chase look great, and I applaud Breygent for stepping up and grabbing more licenses. . . but the 9 card puzzle chase set bothers me a lot.

The artist, if you can’t make it out in the small scan is David Desbois. He’s become a pretty popular artist for Breygent, and he clearly has talent. Unfortunately Mr. Desbois has a bit of a checkered past in Non-Sport Cards. . . If you know what I’m talking about you may think I’m beating a dead horse, and that’s fine — skip the post. . . sadly news about Mr. Desbois didn’t travel that far back in 2008 so to many this is news.

Back in 2008 David Desbois wasn’t working for a trading card company — he just wanted to be. So he apparently picked up some LOTR Masterpieces blanks (or erased penciled cards) and created his own masterpiece. . . The results were stunning, but since he wasn’t officially an artist on the set, and no one knew who he was it seems he decided that ‘Desbois’ wasn’t the best signature, so he changed his art and signed (er… forged) ‘Vanderstelt.’

In David’s own words, as he posted on Scoundrel:

Alright then,
I’ll tell you the story of the fake vanderstelt…
I’m not very proud of it, but I guess we all learn from our mistakes
My name is David Desbois and I’m an artist here in Canada, I mainly do commissions for different people I meet along the way and I plan to get to Topps, maybe for Heroes SE2 or LOTR masterpieces 3, who knows? I think I have what it takes. I send an email with some pictures last week and waiting for a reply. I don’t really know what the process is, but anyway…
The truth is i’m not sure if it’s possible to make a living of it.
I did a card as an unofficial artist on an official card to try my mediums on the card and see if it would look good. well, it came great and I didn’t really know what to do with it, so peer pressure made it ebay and since it cannot sell without a name, I just put one. It was some kind of bet.
Now the card have been restored. It’s bad, but now I’m sorry about it

So I contacted Mark to get some help with topps and he told me to not show it around, but it’s already been shown anyway so I told him that I was gonna keep it. Then Len contacted me to get it and I told him that same story. that’s about it.
now it’s very easy bitching back and forth, but from now on I’ll be straight and you will only find my own ACEO on ebay
sorry for that Mark and I hope we can settle things between each other cuz I’m really a fan of you
byebye
David

Artist Mark McHaley added some additional information:

Unfortunately (or fortunately..depending on how you look at it) I’m able to shed more light on this situation. David is (in fact) the artist of the card with the forged signature. David contacted me a couple of months ago about about me doing a commission for him. On learning about this forgery, I’ve refunded his deposit as I just don’t feel right about doing any kind of business with him. It’s sad…because he seems like a nice guy and a real talent. But the facts speak for themselves. A couple of days ago David contacted me about working for topps. I asked for more samples and said I would forward them on to topps (and our editor quickly replied, being interested). David sent me the same sample that Jason posted along with a ‘test’ card that David said he had done to see how an official topps card handled his paints. I told him that I forwarded the other images to topps, but not the official card that he painted over and that that kind of thing was really frowned upon. My advice was to not show anyone the card and keep it to himself. He said that he would keep it and I quote “(the aragorn I did on Topps card was a test to see what the surface is like for my mediums, but I guess that cannot sell since it’s not real. I’ll keep it)”
Here is the pic he sent me…same as the above…only with his signature. If topps hires him…I sincerely hope that he cleans up his act and flies the straight and narrow from now on. Either way…I also have to inform topps so they can make their own decision.

While these two posts are the most pertinent in the thread and are reprinted here partially in case they delete the threads on Scoundrel the entire discussion can be found here.

David Desbois either destroyed another artists work, or obtained a blank card that he drew on as an unlicensed artist, then he forged the signature of one of the top artists in the set, and tried to sell the card on eBay. Clearly a bad decision, and clearly illegal. . . and while I understand that people make mistakes and change and all that good stuff it bugs me.

He attacked a hobby I love and I won’t forgive that — but more than that it bothers me that so many great artists have paid their dues for years and not had the opportunity to work on base card art, let alone a chase set, yet this guy forges some work and in less than 2 years is cranking out chase card sets for Breygent.

I personally will be avoiding Desbois’ work (he has also worked on Dexter), and in general avoiding sets he is involved with. If his involvement bothers you I suggest you do the same, or notify Breygent of your displeasure.

Jon



© 1997-2013 webjon.com.
You are welcome to quote small passages from webjon non-commercially, but please give credit and link to the original material.
Please do not use images without permission. Names, characters, images, etc may be trademarks of various rights holders.
Please respect their trademarks.
Thank you.